December 10, 2013
It's the Most Wonderful Time of the Year! Hill Staffers Receive Holiday Poem as a Reminder of the Gift Rules
Check out the poem at the following link
November 19, 2013
House Ethics Committee ends Peter Roskam, Bill Owens reviews
The House Ethics Committee will end its reviews into whether Reps. Peter Roskam (R-Ill.) and Bill Owens (D-N.Y.) violated congressional rules during privately funded trips to Taiwan. However, the secretive panel found that Owens’ December 2011 trip to Taiwan was an improper gift because a New York lobbying firm was closely involved in putting the excursion together. But because Owens has already repaid the $22,000-plus cost of the trip, he will not be sanctioned by the Ethics Committee.
The Office of Congressional Ethics, the independent ethics watchdog, had called for broader probes into both Roskam and Owens. The Ethics Committee did not agree to those requests. The Ethics Committee looked into whether Roskam, a top member of the House GOP leadership, accepted an impermissible gift when he and Elizabeth Roskam traveled to Taiwan in October 2011. The Ethics Committee approved the Roskams’ trip beforehand, but OCE believed the Taiwanese government and not the Chinese Culture University — the official sponsor — “was conducting and organizing his trip.”
Under the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act, foreign governments are allowed to pay for such trips. However, a lawmaker cannot accept travel expenses for a spouse or family member. The Roskams’ daughter was also staying in Taiwan at that time, and OCE noted that the Roskams sought to include her as part of their itinerary for the $24,000-plus trip.
September 12, 2013
House Ethics Committee Decides Against Full-Scale Investigations of Four Lawmakers
The House Ethics Committee won’t move forward with full-scale investigations into four lawmakers — Reps. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.), Peter Roskam (R-Ill.), John Tierney (D-Mass.) and Tim Bishop (D-N.Y.) — but will continue to review three of those cases, the secretive panel announced on Wednesday. The panel voted to end outright its review of the allegations against Tierney. The Ethics Committee’s announcement that it will continue to look into Roskam, Bachmann, and Bishop but not launch full-scale investigations is the latest in a growing trend by the panel.
The committee has declined to empanel special investigative subcommittees to handle these matters, but then also has refused to end their investigations outright. The cases then sit in limbo, although based on past practice, the members face little chance of sanction by the committee. The Office of Congressional Ethics, the independent watchdog agency, recommended full investigations of all four lawmakers over the alleged violations. The Ethics Committee reviewed the cases for a three-month period before its Wednesday announcement.
August 22, 2013
Law Review Article on Emoluments Clause
Mr. Jeff Green, Senior Attorney at the Department of Defense Standards of Conduct Office recently published a law review article that summarizes the Emoluments Clause and its applicability to retired military. It also discusses the remedy of debt collection. You can view the article at the following link:
August 14, 2013
McDonnell Returns "Tangible" Gifts from Donor
Virginia Gov. Robert F. McDonnell said he has returned all “tangible” gifts that were given to him and his family members by a wealthy political supporter but declined to detail a list of those items.
Rich Galen, a spokesman for McDonnell’s legal team, said Tuesday that McDonnell did not intend to release an itemized accounting of the items returned to Jonnie R. Williams Sr., the chief executive of a dietary supplement company whose relationship with McDonnell is the subject of state and federal investigations.People familiar with the situation have said Williams’s gifts to the governor’s family included $15,000 worth of high-end clothing purchased for McDonnell’s wife, Maureen, at Bergdorf Goodman in New York and a $6,500 Rolex watch, engraved with the words “71st Governor of Virginia,” that Williams bought for the governor at Maureen McDonnell’s urging. Galen said Tuesday that the Rolex watch, as a tangible gift, was one of the items the governor returned.
August 08, 2013
U.S. Army general improperly accepted gifts in South Korea, report says
A three-star Army general improperly accepted gold-plated Montblanc pens, a $2,000 leather briefcase and other gifts from a South Korean citizen while commanding U.S. troops in that country, newly released documents show.
Joseph F. Fil Jr., the former commander of the U.S. Eighth Army in South Korea, also failed to report a $3,000 cash gift to a member of his family from the unnamed South Korean benefactor, according to a confidential investigative report by the Pentagon’s Office of Inspector General.
July 31, 2013
VA Governor McDonnell says he will return other gifts
Gov. Robert F. McDonnell said Tuesday that he will return all the gifts from businessman Jonnie R. Williams Sr. and indicated for the first time that he was not aware of everything the Star Scientific executive had given to his family.
McDonnell (R) made the comment in a radio interview one week after announcing that he had repaid $120,000 in loans that Williams had made — $70,000 to a real estate company owned by the governor and his sister and $50,000 to first lady Maureen McDonnell.His remarks were his first since last week’s announcement, which was made in a written statement as the governor was en route to Afghanistan to visit Virginia troops. McDonnell said his first priority was to repair the trust with Virginia citizens that may have been lost as a result of the loans and gifts.
July 10, 2013
McDonnell’s corporation, wife allegedly benefited from $120,000 more from donor
The Washington Post reports: A prominent political donor gave $70,000 to a corporation owned by Virginia Gov. Robert F. McDonnell and his sister last year, and the governor did not disclose the money as a gift or loan, according to people with knowledge of the payments.
The donor, wealthy businessman Jonnie R. Williams Sr., also gave a previously unknown $50,000 check to the governor’s wife, Maureen, in 2011, the people said.
June 26, 2013
Donor bought Rolex watch for Virginia Gov. McDonnell, people familiar with gift say
The Washington Post reports: A prominent political donor purchased a Rolex watch for Virginia Gov. Robert F. McDonnell, according to two people with knowledge of the gift, and the governor did not disclose it in his annual financial filings. The $6,500 luxury watch was provided by wealthy businessman Jonnie R. Williams Sr., the people said. He is the chief executive of dietary supplement manufacturer Star Scientific and the person who paid for catering at the wedding of the governor’s daughter. The people spoke on the condition of anonymity because of an ongoing federal investigation into the relationship between Williams and the McDonnell family.
Williams’s gift came in August 2011 — about two weeks after he met with a top state health official to pitch the benefits of his company’s health products at a meeting arranged by first lady Maureen McDonnell, according to people who know of the meeting. Williams bought the watch at the urging of Maureen McDonnell, who admired Williams’s own Rolex and suggested that he buy her a similar one she could give to her husband, the people said. Her proposal occurred moments before the meeting she had arranged with the state official, according to one person familiar with the request.
The Rolex, engraved with the inscription “71st Governor of Virginia,” represents the first undisclosed gift known to have been used personally by McDonnell among tens of thousands of dollars of undisclosed gifts given to the governor’s family.
May 23, 2013
Change to Rules regarding Acceptance of Gifts from Outside Sources
On 16 May 2013, SECDEF waived portions of DoD Directive 5500.07 and DoD 5500.07-R (Joint Ethics Regulation (JER)) to allow enlisted personnel, E-6 and below, to accept gifts in excess of $20 from charitable and veterans service tax-exempt organizations.
Key points to this new guidance: • No monetary cap on value of gift items that may be accepted. • Gifts may not be in the form of cash. The DoD Standards of Conduct Office (SOCO) has informally opined that gift cards, including gift cards with nearly universal purchasing application (such as VISA gift cards), may be accepted in accordance with the new guidance, so long as the gift card is not redeemable or exchangeable for cash. • Gift items must be from charitable and veterans tax-exempt organizations as defined by section 501 (c)(3), (19), and (23) of Title 26, United States Code (Internal Revenue Code). • Waives "wounded warrior" exception procedures of Section 4 of Chapter 3 of JER (requiring a written ethics counselor determination for gifts exceeding $350 per occasion, or $1000 per calendar year, from any one source) when gift items are provided from said tax-exempt organizations to eligible enlisted personnel. • Does not include gift items intended to influence enlisted member in performance of official duties or as improper salary supplementation. • Gift items may not be solicited.
See SecDEF Memo, dtd 16 May 13, re Gifts to Enlisted Members: Download Gift_exception_waiver_for_enlisted_members_-_secdef_memo_of_16_may_2013
April 25, 2013
President Obama's Gift List Released
As President Obama appeared at the Bush library dedication Thursday, the Federal Register posted a list of presidential gifts that could end up in the President's future library.
The list includes gifts presented to the President, first lady Michelle Obama and their children from numerous foreign dignitaries in 2011.
The gifts were turned over to the National Archives and Records Administration, which runs presidential libraries.
April 04, 2013
A Reminder to Feds About the Emoluments Clause
An obscure provision of the Constitution banning acceptance of compensation or items of value from a foreign government contains traps for unwary federal employees and active or retired military personnel, the Pentagon ethics office has said.
The language, designed to prevent influence by foreign nations over U.S. government decisions, covers various forms of pay as well as travel or gifts, says a March white paper from the Defense Department Standards of Conduct Office.“This little known provision, the ‘Emoluments Clause,’ is still in effect today and applies to Federal civilian employees and active-duty military personnel. It also applies to retired military officers and enlisted personnel from the active and reserve components including military officers, enlisted retirees and retired Reservists,” the white paper says.
January 31, 2013
After Ethics Complaint, Senator Pays $58,000 for Flights to Dominican Republic
U.S. Sen. Robert Menendez this month wrote a $58,500 check to a company owned by a South Florida eye doctor and political fundraiser to reimburse him for two personal flights to the Dominican Republic that the New Jersey Democrat did not report on his Senate financial disclosure form, his office confirmed to NBC News Wednesday night.
The disclosure came as law enforcement sources confirmed that FBI agents searched the West Palm Beach, Florida, offices of the doctor, Salomon Melgen, Tuesday night as part of an investigation that includes agents from the Department of Health and Human Services.
Menendez’s office confirmed that the senator — who this week became chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee – wrote the check to Melgen from his personal account after aides reviewed his flight schedule in response to a complaint that a New Jersey Republican official filed with the Senate Ethics Committee last November. The complaint alleged that Menendez violated Senate Ethics rules by “repeatedly flying on a free jet to the Dominican Republic and other locations” and that the jet was provided by Melgen.
The full article may be found here.
December 10, 2012
Holiday Season Gift Guidance from OGE
OGE issued a reminder about the gift rules during the holiday season. The attachment to the Legal Advisory reprises the rules in a poem, as revised in 2009 to address gifts from lobbyists and updated to reflect the current limit on gifts from foreign governments. You may access the Legal Advisory on OGE’s website at: http://www.oge.gov/OGE-Advisories/Legal-Advisories/Legal-Advisories/
December 27, 2011
Alabama Restrictions on Teacher Gifts Raise Questions
NPR reports on the controversy over a new Alabama law prohibiting teachers from accepting gifts. The law allows only "de minimus" gifts, but the state ethics commission interprets this to include a ham, turkey, or gift certificate that has any monetary value.
November 15, 2011
DOD IG Audit Finds US Naval Academy Wrongly Accepted over $150,000 in Gifts
An audit released Thursday, conducted by the DOD IG found that, in addition to improperly contracting for the production of recruiting films, the U.S. Naval Academy also wrongly accepted over $184,000 in gifts of wine and crystal from alumnus between 2005 and 2007 and over $300,000 in corporate sponsorship funds. The audit found that the U.S. Naval Academy Foundation acted as a conduit for the academy by receiving gifts from prohibited sources.
OGE extends comment period on proposed rule: Lobbyist gift ban for all
The Federal Register includes an extension of the comment period for the proposed amendment to 5 CFR 2635.203 which would extend the prohibition on acceptance of gifts from registered lobbyists to all Federal personnel (not just Political appointees under the Ethics Pledge). See http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-11-15/pdf/2011-29569.pdf. Comments are now due NLT: December 14, 2011.
November 06, 2011
Use of Private Aircraft by Governor
While governors are not federal officials, the issues explained in news coverage of the governor of Texas might have some value in illustrating the issues raised by federal officials' acceptance of gifts of air travel:
Mr. Perry’s travels adhere to Texas ethics laws, and he is far from alone in accepting gifts of air travel. But among politicians he stands out for taking private flights for activities that are considered part of his job as governor. That is different from campaign travel or the sort of quasi-official trips for which officeholders normally use private planes, like attending a conference or giving a speech.
“It would be unusual for an official to be flown to Washington to testify before Congress by a special interest of some kind,” said Robert M. Stern, president of the Center for Governmental Studies in Los Angeles. “Usually the state would pay for that.”
Ray Sullivan, a spokesman for Mr. Perry, defended the governor’s use of private planes, saying it was part of an effort to save tax dollars. Mr. Sullivan acknowledged “there are critiques to be made” about using state-owned versus private planes, but said “we chose to err on the side of protecting taxpayers.”
When the governor’s staff asks to use a private plane, no promises are made and no consideration is given to whether the owner has an interest in the trip, he said. “Over the years we’ve developed a good feel for supporters and other Texans who own private aircraft that we could ask to use,” Mr. Sullivan said. “The governor bases all of his decisions on his philosophy and on what he believes is best for the citizens of the state.”
September 29, 2011
Discussion on OGE proposal to expand Lobbying Gift Ban to all Federal Employees
Washington Post article discussing the proposed OGE rule to expand lobbying gift ban to all Federal employees. See http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/limits-tighten-for-lobbyist-gift-giving/2011/09/28/gIQAh6RT5K_story.html
September 22, 2011
No more gifts from Lobbyists?
In a September 18, 2011, posting, we alerted you to the proposed OGE expansion of the Ethics Pledge lobbyist gift ban to all career Federal employees. If you did not see it, please note that the proposed rule was published in the Federal Register for notice and comment. See http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-09-13/pdf/2011-23311.pdf. Comments are due before November 14, 2011.
In sum, the proposed rule would make certain exceptions to the general prohibition on gifts from outside sources, 5 CFR 2635.202, unavailable for gifts from registered lobbyists. The exceptions that would be unavailable would include the $20 deminimus & widely-attended gathering exceptions. It would also provide implementing guidance. For example, it defines the lobbysts for these purposes to exclude 501(c)(3) non-profit lobbyists.
September 18, 2011
OGE Proposes to Expand Lobbyist Gift Ban
The Hill reports:
A new regulation proposed this week by the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) would prohibit all federal government employees from accepting any gifts from lobbyists.
Originally, the absolute ban on lobbyist gifts was only applied to political appointees, per President Obama’s executive order on ethics that was signed early on in his administration. But if the proposed rule is finalized, it would expand the order’s tough restrictions on lobbyist gifts to career employees in the federal government as well.
The regulation also would codify the stringent lobbyist gift ban implemented by Obama’s executive order, meaning the strict limits on the interaction between lobbyists and the Obama administration would stay in place after Obama leaves the White House, unless Congress repeals them or the next president initiates another rule-making procedure to amend the regulation. “What this means is that these broader restrictions will go beyond the Obama administration. They will exist even after he leaves office,” Kenneth Gross, a partner at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, told The Hill.
Thanks to the IEC member who provided this tip.
August 23, 2011
Contractor Contribution Reporting Proposal
Government Executive reports on the status of a proposal to require government contractors to report on their political donations.
August 20, 2011
Gift/Travel Reimbursement Reporting Changes
OGE Legal Advisory LA-11-05 describes a change in the rules on gifts and travel reimbursement reporting thresholds.
July 15, 2011
Soliciting Gifts from Outside Sources
The following pithy notice from an agency ethics office to the workforce struck us as being possibly useful to other agencies as well. We have edited it to remove agency-specific information:
Subject: Reminder On Rules Regarding Solicitation of Gifts from Outside Sources
One of the regular topics of instruction in your annual ethics training is the prohibition on receiving gifts as a result of your status as a federal employee. Gifts include any gratuity, favor, discount, entertainment, hospitality, loan, forbearance, or other item having monetary value. The reason for this rule is to avoid any actions violating the law and ethical standards of public trust or creating the appearance of private gain.
There are limited exceptions when a gift may be accepted, guidance for which is found at the agency's ethics website or by contacting GC.
This notice is a reminder of the specific prohibitions on the solicitation of gifts. Employees shall not, directly or indirectly, solicit a gift or other item of monetary value from a prohibited source; or solicit a gift because of an employee's official position. There are no exceptions to this rule.
A prohibited source includes any person or entity seeking official action from, doing business with, or conducting activities regulated by this agency. This includes, for example, our implementing partners, or other think tanks or entities we interact with in our official positions.
It would also be a violation to solicit a gift based upon your status as an employee of this agency. For instance, soliciting complimentary or "comped" tickets for a dinner or reception hosted by an outside organization would be improper. This also applies even if the goal is to ensure or increase agency participation. The substance or merit of the activity is not a consideration.
Where improper gift solicitation occurs, any solicited gifts must be returned to the donor or the recipient must pay the fair market value. Disciplinary action against the employee making the solicitation may be warranted.
Once again, if you have any questions, please seek guidance at the above web sites or by contacting GC for advice.
July 01, 2011
OGE updates regs for gift reporting
The Office of Government Ethics issued its final rule (technical amendment) increasing the financial disclosure reporting threshold for gifts from $335 to $350, to correspond with the Foreign Gifts & Decorations Act. See 5 CFR 2634.304 and 2634.907(g). The rule is effective July 1, 2011, and retroactive to January 1, 2011. The rule also increases the threshold for exclusion for individual items from $135 to $140. The amendment also increases the gift exception ceiling for non-sponsor gifts of free attendance at widely attended gatherings. See 5 CFR 2635.204(g).
See Fed. Reg. notice at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-07-01/pdf/2011-16642.pdf.
May 31, 2011
GSA final rule for increase in "minimal value" for Foreign Gifts & Decorations Act
GSA published a final rule on 26 May 2011 increasing the "minimal Value" for foreign gifts under the Foreign Gifts and Decorations Act (5 U.S.C. 7342), from $335 to $350, retroactive to January 1, 2011. See 76 Fed. Reg. 30550 (http://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2011/05/26/2011-13028/federal-management-regulation-change-in-consumer-price-index-minimal-value#p-3).
It is anticipated that the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) will in turn issue a final rule amending 5 CFR 2634.304 and 2634.907(g) to increase (1) the aggregation reporting threshold for gifts from a single source on OGE Forms 278 and 450 to $350 and (2) the exclusion for individual items to $140. It is also anticipated that OGE will revise 5 CFR 2635.204(g)(2) to increase to $350 the gift exception ceiling for non-sponsor gifts of free attendance at widely attended gatherings.
May 21, 2011
Does Giving Someone a Free Cup of Coffee Induce Corruption?Washington Monthly essayist Joshua Tucker contemplates the slippery slope of accepting small gratuities. Here's an excerpt:
The problem is, where do you draw the line? If three of the four coffee shops in a neighborhood give out free coffee to the police, does the fourth one have to? And if it is OK to give the policy coffee, then how about a bagel? If a bagel’s fine, what about breakfast? And if breakfast is OK, then how about dinner? And why stop there - surely the copy store and the stationary store will want to show their appreciation as well. Some small businesses may not have an appropriately useful gift from the shop for the local police, so why not just give them money? And of course, why stop with the police? The fire department also provides useful services, as do local building inspectors, and so on. At some point, this begins to resemble a much more corrupt society, where cash is needed to secure services that are supposed to be provided by the state.
May 09, 2011
OGE on YouTube
OGE has training videos at YouTube:
- Criminal conflict of interest statute (18 U.S.C. 208)
- Impartiality (5 C.F.R. 2635,Subpart E)
- Gifts from Outside Sources (5 C.F.R.2635, Subpart B)
April 26, 2011
Marine sentenced for receiving illegal gifts
U.S. Marine Corps Major plead guilty to and is sentenced to 12 months and a day (felony) for recieving illegal gifts as a contracting officer representative.
See Havelock News article: http://www.havenews.com/news/harrington-8339-receiving-marine.html; or Re-publication of DOJ press release: http://isenberg.securitycontracting.net/2011/04/marine-major-sentenced-for-receiving-illegal-gratuities/
April 25, 2011
Soliciting Gifts: A Reminder
We recently came across an interesting reminder notice about soliciting gifts from outside sources and are posting a copy here, to help other agencies that might want to do something similar:
February 11, 2011
Former Staff Member in U.S. House of Representatives Convicted on Corruption Charges
A jury found a former staff member in the U.S. House of Representatives guilty on corruption charges relating to his acceptance of an all-expenses paid trip to Game One of the 2003 World Series. See DOJ Press Release at: http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2011/February/11-crm-176.html. Charges included lying on his financial disclosure about the gift from a lobbyist.
February 02, 2011
Gifts of Sporting Event Tickets
Wiley Rein lawyers Paul Khoury and Craig Smith have drafted a "Hot Issue Alert" entitled Event Tickets For Federal Employees: Just Don't Do It that analyzes legal issues involved in government employee acceptance of gifts of tickets to sporting events worth more than their face value. The authors focus on the implications of Chenega Management, LLC v. United States, a September 14, 2010 Federal Circuit opinion. Here's the article introduction:
When the market value of tickets far exceeds their face value, which anyone who has used StubHub or a ticket broker knows is common, the legal analysis is murky, but the answer is simple: Don't do it.
This advice runs counter to what you might conclude after reading the Government's own rules on gifts. ...
Thanks to the IEC member who tipped us off to this significant analysis.
January 07, 2011
The Cupcake Caper
Thanks to the alert IEC member who tipped us off to a Wall Street Journal item about an AT&T gift of cupcakes to senior officials considering Internet access rules. Complaints prompted an FCC spokesperson to respond: "We're pro-open Internet and pro-cupcake." A future Training Tips column will provide suggestions on how to use incidents like this to add human interest elements to ethics training.
The IEC Journal lives or dies by reader contributions. We appreciate your assistance a great deal, and we earnestly solicit your continued support.
November 16, 2010
New OLC opinion on Emoluments Clause and Foreign Gifts Act
Neither the Emoluments Clause of the Constitution nor the Foreign Gifts and Decorations Act would bar an employee of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration from accepting the 2010 Göteborg Award for Sustainable Development, because the aware would not be "from any King, Prince, or foreign State." For similar reasons acceptance would also not violate the Foreign Gifts & Decorations Act. See full opinion at http://www.justice.gov/olc/2010/goteborg_award.pdf
November 13, 2010
OGE 2009 Prosecution Survey
The Office of Government Ethics issued DAEOgram DO-10-017 on November 9, 2010 announcing the publication of the 2009 Conflict of Interest Prosecution Survey. The survey contains summaries of cases involving conflict of interest violations. The Department of Justice prosecuted the cases. See http://www.usoge.gov/ethics_guidance/daeograms/dgr_files/2010/do10017.pdf
Posted by Account Deleted in Inspectors General, Issues: Conflicts of Interest, Issues: Financial Disclosure, Issues: Gifts, Issues: Misuse of Govt. Resources, Issues: Misuse of Position, Issues: Outside Activities, Issues: Post Employment, OGE | Permalink
August 19, 2010
Even where ethics rules are not violated, the appearance remains.Article from Business Insider on the appearance of impartiality for Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner who accepted a very generous gift from a close friend who is now an executive for JPMorgan. See full article at http://www.businessinsider.com/daniel-zelikow-2010-8
June 02, 2010
IG Report on MMSThe recent Department of the Interior Inspector General report on improprieties in the Minerals Management Service is available. This is not the first OIG report to address similar MMS problems, which we discussed in a September 10, 2008 posting.
December 12, 2009
Animated Holiday Ethics Slide Show
Jennifer Dickey, of the Department of Treasury's Financial Management Service, was kind enough to share a whimsically charming animated slide show used in her office:
The slide show is in the form of a Microsoft PowerPoint script that will run automatically if users select the file. Important: You can customize the slide show for use in your own office if desired. To avoid having the show run automatically, open PowerPoint first, then select the file. You can edit it in this manner.
December 03, 2009
DoD SOCO on Holiday Parties
Thanks to Mark Stone for reminding us of the excellent 2008 DoD Standards of Conduct Office memo on holiday party issues.
December 8 Update: The 2009 DoD guidance is also available.
October 22, 2009
Nobel Prize as Emoluments Clause Issue?
Updated Oct. 26 to correct typo:
As might be expected in these politically polarized times, the argument in a Washington Post opinion piece entitled An Unconstitutional Nobel that the President's acceptance of the Nobel Peace Prize would violate the Emoluments Clause has prompted a number of rebuttals. Yale Law School Professor Jack Balkin's rebuttal is confident and concise. UCLA Professor Eugene Volokh's assessment seems to be somewhere in the middle.
June 29, 2009
Examples of Gift Ethics Issues
Writing in the Washington Post, Al Kamen's discussion of VIP-level gifts from foreign governments provides good teaching examples. Who would have guessed that a Singapore official would give President George W. Bush a "Creative Zen MP3 Player and an OSIM uSqueez Calf and Foot Massager."
June 14, 2009
Saudi Gift Issues
Thanks to Karen Santoro for drawing to our attention a Politico article about practical issues involved in handling expensive ceremonial gifts from the Saudi government to U.S. officials.
February 06, 2009
GSA Final Rule (FMR): Appraisal of Foreign Gifts
General Services Administration amended the Federal Management Regulation (FMR) to revise its policy on appraisals of foreign gifts and decorations, and to encourage agencies to use various methods in obtaining appraisals, including reliable retail Web sites. See http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-562.pdf.
General Services Administration amended the Federal Management Regulation (FMR) to revise its policy on appraisals of foreign gifts and decorations, and to encourage agencies to use various methods in obtaining appraisals, including reliable retail Web sites. See http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-562.pdf.
January 29, 2009
More Abramoff Fallout
An AP story indicates:
The government says Todd Boulanger gave government aides "a stream of things of value," including all-expense-paid travel, tickets to professional sports and concerts and nights out at expensive restaurants, to reward and influence actions that would benefit his clients. He was charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud.
Talking Points Memo has an archive of posts about the newest person being charged, Todd Boulanger.
November 20, 2008
A timely reminder today can save a ton of headaches later. Here's a holiday reminder message on gifts and widely attended gatherings that one agency recently distributed to all hands via its intranet.
July 15, 2008
DOD SOCO Enlightment on Widely Attended Gatherings
The newest SOCO Advisory is a "special edition" on the topic "Application of the Widely Attended Gathering (WAG) Gift Exception to Invitations to Play Golf or Attend Sporting, Recreational or Entertainment Events.”
June 26, 2008
Free Golf Leads to Trouble
Government Executive reports that accepting a free round of golf in 2006 has become an ethics issue for a Department of Justice official. The official allegedly gave a $500,000 grant to the foundation that hosted him, rather than better qualified applicants.
May 21, 2008
In Iowa, the big business section topic is corn. In Seattle, it's the high tech industry. In Washington, a different industry dominates: government and lobbyists.
The Washington Post reported recently on a Washington Redskins marketing ploy. A handout for salesmen titled "Government Ethics Rules re: Suite Tickets" notes that "Government officials/employees can accept invitations to your Suite" through "Suite Guest Passes: These passes allow recipients who already have a ticket to the game to drop by an Executive Level Suite for a short visit." After discussing the use of such suites by House/Senate employees, the brochure goes on to talk more broadly about civil service employees:
Limited View/standing room only Tickets: These tickets cost $25. A government employee who bought such a ticket from the Redskins could accept a Suite Guest Pass (referenced above) from you to visit your suite without reimbursing you.
The Post story notes that several ethics experts have reservations about the practice described in the sales literature.
February 11, 2008
An "Understanding" Enough for Bribery Conviction
The specific intent element (quid pro quo / this for that) for bribery, extortion, and honest services mail fraud crimes may be satisfied by showing that a government official received a benefit in exchange for his promise to perform specific official acts or to perform such acts as the opportunities arise. It is sufficient if the defendant understood he was expected as a result of the payment to exercise particular kinds of influence on behalf of the payor as specific opportunities arose.